Artifact review · static snapshot
AI Governance Control Layer case study merged
Context-only case study describing the governed AI-assisted proof routing model. Not pipeline proof.
- What changed
- A reviewer-visible case study was merged into the proof repo describing how AI work is bounded by deterministic gates, evidence records, and human review. The document is a context artifact — it explains the model and routes reviewers to the proof surfaces; it does not itself promote any new claim.
- What this supports
- A bounded, reviewer-visible explanation of the governed AI-assisted control layer exists in the proof repo and is reachable from this website rendering.
- What this does NOT prove
- Runtime-active behaviour, signal-observed status, public-safe runtime proof, autonomous SOC, AI-approved disposition, analyst-approved disposition, fleet-wide coverage, or external/customer adoption. The case study is context only; it is not pipeline proof.
- Review route · next inspection
- Open the case study on the proof repo, then trace back to the HO-DET-001 record to inspect the controlled-test boundary the case study refers to.
Claim boundary
Public ceiling
CONTROLLED_TEST_VALIDATED
Public-safe state
NOT_PUBLIC_SAFE
Website rendering
is not proof
Human review
REQUIRED
This page is a public-safe reviewer surface. The artifact is a hand-maintained static snapshot taken on 2026-05-18. It is not auto-updated, does not claim runtime-active or signal-observed status, and does not prove public-safe runtime proof, GPU CI proven status, model execution in CI, AI-approved disposition, analyst-approved disposition, autonomous SOC, fleet-wide coverage, or any external or customer deployment. Stronger wording requires a separate evidence-backed promotion gate.